Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Next in thread: No Way: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote:
>> "Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>> It might only be this way in the halting
>>> problem. It is very rare that a program is both
>>> input data and a function caller at the same
>>> time.
>> "Rare"? Pretty much every program whose source
>> code was ever handed to a compiler matches that
>> description.
> Which is not at all the same thing as an
> analytical impossibility
Peter, a person reading replies such as this from
you, and most of them read very much like this one,
would be forgiven for thinking you do all your
posting to the Internet, blind stinking drunk.
What in _hell_ was that supposed to mean?
You claimed that "It is very rare that a program is
both input data and a function called at the same
time".
I replied that [Peter, you are in error...]: every
program given to a compiler _is_ (by that very fact)
"input data", and almost every program given to a
compiler calls a function (since most of the
"library code" modules are functions, that is almost
inescapable).
What brand of inebriation produced what you wrote in
response? It is not the least bit responsive to the
trend up to then of the conversation, and like
almost everything you write here, makes no sense at
all. Tt is just English words tossed into a shape
much like the shape of a sentence, but giving no
evidence of a functioning brain having been involved
in that act of tossing.
xanthian.
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Next in thread: No Way: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|