Re: Liar paradox, one more time
From: Poker Joker (Poker_at_wi.rr.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- In reply to: Paul Holbach: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Next in thread: Paul Holbach: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:30:36 GMT
"Paul Holbach" <paulholbachSPAMBAN@freenet.de> wrote in message
news:881c8779.0407301125.1567a2f1@posting.google.com...
> > "Poker Joker" <Poker@wi.rr.com> wrote in message news:<
> > YkiOc.56407$vN3.20520@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>...
> > > "Paul Holbach" <paulholbachSPAMBAN@freenet.de> wrote in message
> > > news:881c8779.0407291735.34ac845a@posting.google.com...
>
> > > Would you mind revealing your definition of "semantically acceptable"?
>
> > Let's just say that a sentence is semantically acceptable if its meaning
> > is well understood; Almost everyone who would be expected to receive
> > the message would gather the same meaning. With regards to the
> > following sentence: "This sentence is not true." What meaning do you
> > gather?
>
> The meaning I gather is that the sentence "This sentence is not true"
> says of itself that it is not true.
So you gather nothing other than the words. That's what your
telling me. You said the sentence means the words in it. I normally
can express meaning beyond the given words in a seentence, but
I don't blame you if you can't.
> > Do you think it is the same meaning I gather?
>
> I beg your pardon, but I happen to be incapable of scanning your mind
> telepathically.
So you are incabable of reasoning out what I might think? Note that
I didn't ask you what I think. I asked you about something you thought.
Is your answer as far as your thoughts can go?
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- In reply to: Paul Holbach: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Next in thread: Paul Holbach: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|