Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Maybe in reply to: Anonymous: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:04:04 -0500
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 03:07:36 GMT, "Peter Olcott"
<olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>"David C. Ullrich" <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote in message news:vmmkg0hbt6hpurd4al38fi7de8td1o3u67@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:26:48 GMT, "Peter Olcott"
>
>> >My question was my question.
>>
>> the answer to your question is no. you're free to ignore simple
>> logic and insist you don't believe the answer's no, but continuing
>> to ask the qwuestion after it's been answered thousands of times
>> is bizarre. [which is why people assumed that you were not
>> asking thart question, instead asking whether that's what i
>> was saying...]
>
>And you provided this response without even reading a single
>word of the question below. This question that has not yet
>been answered by anyone.
uh, the question was
'>> > So it is always possible for an outside observer to correctly
>> > determine whether or not any possible program will halt, or not.
>> > Is this correct?'
which has been answered a few thousand times so far.
>> >I want to know that answer to my
>> >question, not my question in the context of some other question. It
>> >seems to me that im each and every one of these halting problem
>> >cases, I can see whether or not the program will halt or not, even if
>> >the program itself can not see this.
>> >
>> >I can see this because the halting problem can not be constructed to
>> >effect the view of the outside observer. It can't go into any infinte loop,
>> >or an infinte cycle based on the results of analysis that is not available
>> >to it.
>> >
>> >Because of this any outside observer can (in theory) solve the Halting
>> >Problem. This is the same idea as the void WillHalt() function. We
>> >don't have to have a void WillHalt() function, void functions are not
>> >available in Turing Machines. We can have a separate memory space.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ************************
>>
>> David C. Ullrich
>>
>> sorry about the inelegant formatting - typing
>> one-handed for a few weeks...
>
************************
David C. Ullrich
sorry about the inelegant formatting - typing
one-handed for a few weeks...
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Maybe in reply to: Anonymous: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|