Re: Future truths.
From: |-|erc (gotch_at_beauty.com)
Date: 08/02/04
- Next message: |-|erc: "new programming language idea"
- Previous message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: Future truths."
- Next in thread: Antonio Espejo: "Re: Future truths."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:33:54 GMT
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in
> and x -> declare (a, x) Someone said something true, therefore they were telling the truth
>
retract that.
x -> (declare (a, x) -> speakstruth(a))
The problem lies just outside of standard mathamatics and theorem provers,
since the variables are dynamic. It could be modelled as a theorem prover
that is perpetually running and hence has a changing set of hypothesis.
Herc
- Next message: |-|erc: "new programming language idea"
- Previous message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: Future truths."
- Next in thread: Antonio Espejo: "Re: Future truths."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]