Re: P=NP
From: Pspoors (pspoors_at_aol.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Pspoors: "Re: P=NP"
- Previous message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: P=NP"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: P=NP"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: P=NP"
- Reply: Pspoors: "Re: P=NP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 03 Aug 2004 16:12:54 GMT
i am a newbie so i should introduce myself, i am from university of leeds,
first year phd student. the only problem with my proof so far is that i haven't
written it down. it is based on an idea for a set of axioms which define a
computer. they work but it changes our understanding of what a computer is and
in turn could even resolve church turing
- Next message: Pspoors: "Re: P=NP"
- Previous message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: P=NP"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: P=NP"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: P=NP"
- Reply: Pspoors: "Re: P=NP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]