Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1
From: >parr\(*> (gniKyruaL_at_tenretnitb.moc)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Previous message: >parr\(*>: "Gina's multiplication problem - what I got out of it"
- In reply to: James Dolan: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Next in thread: Jon Haugsand: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:43:29 +0000 (UTC)
"James Dolan" <jdolan@math-cl-n03.math.ucr.edu> wrote in message
news:cektcc$4jl$1@glue.ucr.edu...
Hi James,
Thanks for taking the trouble to put your approach together.
| below is a sample of the general approach that i'd try in a
situation
| like that. as others have pointed out, though, it's crucial to get
| feedback from the student themself, to answer their particular
| questions and adjust to their particular difficulties; getting
pretend
| feedback from someone who themself had little success in explaining
| things to the student is not an adequate substitute.
I agree. Too artificial.
| -------------------------------------------------------------------
--- | in order to understand things like | "negative 3 times negative 4 = positive twelve | [Detailed description of highly practical approach snipped] I like your approach, which is a way of saying I'm sure that 'Gina' would not have been confused by technicalities and would have been able to relate to the various things you suggest. I won't pretend to know how Gina's intuition would have reacted. Partly because I didn't use such an approach myself, and partly because, when I read it through, there was no 'Gina' (my own intuition as to how she would have reacted) which accepted nor rejected the key demonstrations and associated descriptions. Out of interest, do you get an intuition of how others would react to something you've just seen? If so, you will have an idea of the process I was using to give the pretend feedback. | --------------------------------------- | <...> text-based internet is not such a good | medium for demonstrating how to respond, <...> I agree. The real killer is that an approach has to be presented as a whole because usenet is not a chatroom. The process is more-or-less open loop without all the checks and balances of face-to-face dialogue. Thanks again. I'm calling it a day now this thread has exploded to near 60 posts. Elsewhere in sci.logic, I sum up what I got out of it. -- )>==ss$$%PARR(º> Parr
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Previous message: >parr\(*>: "Gina's multiplication problem - what I got out of it"
- In reply to: James Dolan: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Next in thread: Jon Haugsand: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|