Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1
From: >parr\(*> (gniKyruaL_at_tenretnitb.moc)
Date: 08/06/04
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Previous message: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Maybe in reply to: Dan Christensen: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:43:30 +0000 (UTC)
"Will Twentyman" <wtwentyman@read.my.sig> wrote in message
news:410a5fb8_5@newsfeed.slurp.net...
|
| I've always preferred to explain this by example:
Still a good example. Given it was a first cut at the problem, I was
impressed. My first thought was, "Yes, this would have worked". But
as I worked through 'Gina's reply, I was reminded of her 'two wrongs'
response to one of my suggestions.
Thanks for your time spent preparing the presentation.
I'm calling it a day now this thread has exploded to near 60 posts.
Elsewhere in sci.logic, I sum up what I got out of it.
-- )>==ss$$%PARR(º> Parr
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Previous message: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Maybe in reply to: Dan Christensen: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: Why should -1 multiplied by -1 be plus 1 and not -1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]