Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website

From: Simon G Best (s.g.best_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 08/07/04 

Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:54:36 +0000 (UTC)

Peter Olcott wrote:
>
> What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation?
> Most of the attempts at refutation did not even try to form a sound
> argument. Most of them were mere empty rhetoric. Rhetoric is what
> people typically use when they run out of reason. If I am as wrong as
> it is being proposed that I am wrong there should be at least two dozen
> valid refutations. There are NONE!

I notice you've been ignoring my recent thought experiment and the
accompanying refutation. Ignorance doesn't make you right; it just
makes you an idiot.

> It never has been that anyone here could show that I was wrong. It has
> always been I don't believe that he could be right. It doesn't seem to make
> any sense that he could be right. I really don't want him to be right.
> Provide me with a single valid refutation, and ONLY this will prove
> these assessments (at least to a slight degree) are incorrect.

That's been done. Work through the thought experiment I gave you and
you'll see.

> Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity?
> I really don't want to waste my time on an effort this is bound to fail.
> I do have much better things that I could be doing, iff, this effort is
> bound to fail. So far not a single person has provided me with anything
> remotely resembling great clarity that I am wrong. After all this time and
> effort, the lack of a valid refutation that I am incorrect, tends to build
> an increasingly stronger support case that I am correct.

No, it "tends to build an increasingly stronger support case" that you
are deliberately disregarding the clear refutations of your arguments.
Your ignorance of my thought experiment is clear evidence of this.

Simon

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > time believing it (which is probably why few scientists are religious, ... Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity? ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > time believing it (which is probably why few scientists are religious, ... Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity? ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... > What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > I really don't want to waste my time on an effort this is bound to fail. ... it "tends to build an increasingly stronger support case" that you ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... >> What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... >> an increasingly stronger support case that I am correct. ... your complete satisfaction, I will keep explaining them in increasing ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... >> What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... >> an increasingly stronger support case that I am correct. ... your complete satisfaction, I will keep explaining them in increasing ...
    (sci.logic)
Quantcast