Re: Halting Problem: Give up
From: George Greene (greeneg_at_cs.unc.edu)
Date: 08/10/04
- Next message: Acme Diagnostics: "re: Rado's Sigma and the Halting Problem for Programs"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Reply: >parr\(*>: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Aug 2004 08:42:18 -0700
"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote in message news:<5d675720328207e71de2169c7dc5c533.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>...
> It's unlikely that I've counted right, but roughly,
> including this posting, Peter Olcott has now wasted
> 1646 news articles in comp.theory.
In sci.logic we are USED to this sort of thing.
The most constructive thing anyone from comp.theory
can do is just not reply. The most constructive thing
that people replying from other fora can do is make
sure they remove comp.theory from the to-group list.
This never should've been allowed out of sci.logic.
- Next message: Acme Diagnostics: "re: Rado's Sigma and the Halting Problem for Programs"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Reply: >parr\(*>: "Re: Halting Problem: Give up"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|