Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Previous message: Marc Goodman: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Next in thread: Ken Pledger: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Reply: Ken Pledger: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Reply: G. Frege: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:16:15 +0000 (UTC)
"Daryl McCullough" <daryl@atc-nycorp.com> wrote:
> So maybe we should introduce a notation to mean a Peter Olcott thread. Maybe
> there could be a single subject, such as "That Peter Olcott Thread", or maybe
> we could just make sure every Peter Olcott thread have a title that starts
> with [PO].
Won't help. Over in sci.math, there's been a poster bot running for at
least a year now that tags every original posting by Jams Harris with
"JSH" in the subject line, reposts the article, and forge-cancels the
original. To no avail.
xanthian.
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Previous message: Marc Goodman: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Next in thread: Ken Pledger: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Reply: Ken Pledger: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Reply: G. Frege: "Re: Troll 1, Usenet 0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
