Re: logical paradoxes
From: Kenneth Doyle (nobody_at_notmail.com)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: logical paradoxes"
- Previous message: r.e.s.: "Re: Rado's Sigma and the Halting Problem for Programs"
- In reply to: patty: "Re: logical paradoxes"
- Next in thread: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: logical paradoxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:03:39 GMT
patty <pattyNO@SPAMicyberspace.net> wrote in
news:pZUUc.43329$TI1.8684@attbi_s52:
> This is the absolute end of this thread. There is no possible rebuttal
> to my analysis ;) (Who is she kidding)
heh! That's a brave statement to make on usenet.
I only replied to Traveller because I thought, if he's going to reply with
a non sequitur then it should at least be a factually correct non sequitur.
-- CodeCutter - good, fast and cheap; pick two.
- Next message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: logical paradoxes"
- Previous message: r.e.s.: "Re: Rado's Sigma and the Halting Problem for Programs"
- In reply to: patty: "Re: logical paradoxes"
- Next in thread: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: logical paradoxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]