Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic
From: Herman Jurjus (h.jurjus_at_hetnet.nl)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: Steve Hayes: "Re: Atheists dying"
- Previous message: George: "Re: Atheists dying"
- In reply to: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic"
- Next in thread: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic"
- Reply: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:24:27 +0200
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
[snip]
> Second order logic is incomplete in the sense that there is no complete
> deductive system for it, or in other words the second order logical
> consequences of a given second order theory or sentence are not
> recursively enumerable. Gödel's incompleteness theorems do apply to
> second order theories as well in the sense that for all theories
> containing a fragment elementary arithemtic and (sound) deductive system
> there are propositions which are neither refutable nor provable in the
> theory according to the deductive system.
With 'theory' you mean recursively enumerable theory, and for 'deductive
system', a similar restriction is required, i think?
-- Cheers, Herman Jurjus
- Next message: Steve Hayes: "Re: Atheists dying"
- Previous message: George: "Re: Atheists dying"
- In reply to: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic"
- Next in thread: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic"
- Reply: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Godel's Incompleteness and Nonmonotonic Logic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|