Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)
From: G. Frege (no_spam_at_aol.com)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: main connective in SL"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Nothing exists, is contradictory."
- In reply to: Marc Goodman: "Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Reply: >parr\(*>: "Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:41:37 +0200
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:34:16 GMT, Marc Goodman
<marc.goodman@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> I'm strictly in this for entertainment value, personally.
>
Well, that's actually an "argument" a troll could use too:
he's strictly in this for entertainment value.
>
> I don't find you particularly entertaining (or even vaguely
> interesting for that matter), so *plonk*
>
Bruhahahah! :-)))
F.
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: main connective in SL"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Nothing exists, is contradictory."
- In reply to: Marc Goodman: "Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Next in thread: >parr\(*>: "Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Reply: >parr\(*>: "Re: [PO] Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|