Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: Robert Low: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 06:37:53 -0500
On 28 Aug 2004 10:47:48 GMT, mtx014@linux.services.coventry.ac.uk
(Robert Low) wrote:
>
>David C. Ullrich <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote:
>>(Robert Low) wrote:
>>>You have no idea what 'a forteriori' means, do you?
>>
>>uh, to be fair i don't either. if you'd said 'a fortiori'
>>i'd understand what -that-0 meant...
>
>Oh, bugger. My mistake. I'm sure I've been saying
>and writing 'a forteriori' for a long time, too.
>Must have somehow polluted it with 'a posteriori'.
ah. seems to be a common misspelling, based on the
number of hits in a google search. i couldn't figure
out where people got it from - 'a posteriori' must
be the reason.
************************
David C. Ullrich
sorry about the inelegant formatting - typing
one-handed for a few weeks...
- Next message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: Robert Low: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|