Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
From: Mr. X (no_spam_at_aol.com)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Bernard: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:46:04 +0200
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:45:55 GMT, "Peter Olcott"
<olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> No one has yet been able to eliminate any of my methods.
>
Methods, w h i c h methods, idiot?
- Next message: Bernard: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]