Existence as predicate
From: Terry Firma (tarald.a_at_online.no)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Mitch Harris: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: The Sophist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Craig Franck: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Robert Trypuz: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: rbb: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:23:08 +0200
This is an attempt at refuting Kant's claim that a thing's existence can't
be a predicate:
Since everything is connected ("hangs together") - there are no absolute
dividing lines / there is no empty space - everything must have a *common
denominator*; this common denominator must be necessary (since everything is
necessary / has at least one cause); therefore general existence must have a
necessary component/aspect in order to exist (therefore existence is a
quality/predicate).
- Next message: Mitch Harris: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: The Sophist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Craig Franck: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Robert Trypuz: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: rbb: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|