Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
From: Simon G Best (s.g.best_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Robibnikoff: "Re: Atheists dying"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:17:24 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Olcott wrote:
> "Simon G Best" <s.g.best@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:41319740.1040003@btopenworld.com...
>
[...]
>
> [...] SInce there is a very good chance that
> this eliminates the rest of your material, I will not read it
> in this case. [...]
But without reading it, you don't know.
Your decision not to read our responses to your posts does not mean that
we aren't refuting and debunking your claims. It does, however, mean
that you're repeatedly ignoring the many refutations and debunkings of
your claims.
I'll respond to the rest of your response once you've actually read
through what you're responding to.
Simon
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Robibnikoff: "Re: Atheists dying"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|