Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension

From: Simon G Best (s.g.best_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 08/30/04 

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:52:24 +0000 (UTC)

Mitch Harris wrote:
> Simon G Best <s.g.best@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh, come on, Peter! If you actually bothered to properly read the many,
>>many, many replies you've had to your posts, you'd already know and
>>understand that it's /not/ that we don't 'get it', it's that we can see
>>that you're /ignoring/ the corrections that have so often been posted to
>>your 'misunderstandings'.
>
> But what if we're wrong?

What, about the Halting Problem? Or about Olcott being willfully ignorant?

Simon

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension
    ... Mitch Harris wrote: ... >>Oh, come on, Peter! ... >>many, many replies you've had to your posts, you'd already know and ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: Why Windows Lost The Battle for the Desktop
    ... The article you sent does not describe Peter's posts. ... >> Peter, I've seen many replies from you and every one of them has nothing ... They all have attachments on them, ... >> Please learn how to post replies without using attachments. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: anagrams and my clock
    ... his replies were earlier than my posts. ... I checked, and sure enough my clock was five minutes fast, so I corrected ... They are coming through here ok, Peter ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)
  • Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension
    ... Simon G Best wrote: ... >Oh, come on, Peter! ... >many, many replies you've had to your posts, you'd already know and ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension
    ... Simon G Best wrote: ... >Oh, come on, Peter! ... >many, many replies you've had to your posts, you'd already know and ...
    (comp.theory)