Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Previous message: Simon G Best: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Jym: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Jym: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:59:36 -0500
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:35:37 +0200, Jym <moyen@loria.fr> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Peter Olcott wrote:
>
>> Since I accept your claim to have a PhD in computer science and
>> hold that rank of associate professor, I will give your response a
>> much higher weight of priority, and carefully study this today. I just
>> printed it out.
>
>1/ Do we really have to show our academic titles in order to be read by
>you ?
>2/ Do you have a PhD in computer science that will give us reasons to read
>you ?
read the start of the earlier threads: he has a bs in cs and he once
took a course in this stuff. the reason we should pay attention to him
is he's a self-admitted genius who understands the issues here better
than anyone in history.
a naive observer might find that a little implausible given the way
his claims keep changing. but no, when he says x is white one day
and x is black the next day that's just 'nuances'.
a fascinating aspect of all this is that he gets irritated when people
paraphrase/interpret the things he says. we must always reply to
-exactly- what he writes, because he always says -exactly- what he
means - the reason people don't understand him is that they don't
realize he means exactly what he says.
>3/ When you just answer to a very small part of a very long message, could
>learn how to destroy inwanted lines (and thus increase slightly the
>signal/noise ratio) ?
>
>Hypocoristiquement,
>Jym.
************************
David C. Ullrich
sorry about the inelegant formatting - typing
one-handed for a few weeks...
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Previous message: Simon G Best: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Jym: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Jym: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Maybe reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|