Re: Existence as predicate
From: Paul Holbach (paulholbachSPAMBAN_at_freenet.de)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Previous message: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- In reply to: Tarald Andresen: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Next in thread: Tarald Andresen: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Tarald Andresen: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 31 Aug 2004 11:41:52 -0700
> "Tarald Andresen" <tarald.a@online.no> wrote in message news:<
> hCVYc.4155$WW4.58365@news4.e.nsc.no>...
> Nothingness/emptiness cannot exist (an "empty space" has no content - it
> "consists" of nothingness - thus the concept 'empty space' must also be
> empty, have no content). Thus there is nothing that can disconnect any
> matter from other matter, and so everything is connected (to matter).
No, your "thus" is a non sequitur.
There certainly cannot be any such thing as nothingness (Iīm not
saying there couldnīt be nothing!), but nothingness is not emptiness!
"The so-called field equations of Einsteinīs general theory of
relativity--which forms the basis of modern scientific
cosmology--admit of solutions in which space is entirely devoid of
matter and energy. So, mathematically, at least, it seems that the
notion of perfectly 'empty' space is perfectly coherent."
[Lowe, E. J. (2002). /A survey of metaphysics/. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. (p. 256)]
#PH
- Next message: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Previous message: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- In reply to: Tarald Andresen: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Next in thread: Tarald Andresen: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Tarald Andresen: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|