Re: Existence as predicate
From: Kenneth Doyle (nobody_at_notmail.com)
Date: 09/01/04
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Previous message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Atheists dying"
- Maybe in reply to: Immortalist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Next in thread: Witt: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Witt: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: G. Frege: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: G. Frege: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:53:13 GMT
"Witt" <oorionus@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:UdEYc.107903$UTP.80330@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com:
>
> "Robert Trypuz" <trypuz@poczta.enterpol.pl> wrote in message
> news:cgund7$dje$2@achot.icm.edu.pl...
> > Everybody knows that adding a predicate "exist" to Predicate Calculus
> > leads to CONTRADICTION.
> > (Proof is very simple).
>
> ???
> Can we see your very simple proof?
>
hmm... Can I have a go?
The predicate E is "does exist".
The predicate N is "has a number of predicates".
ForAll x (Ex iff Nx).
x exists if and only if it has at least one predicate. That seems
axiomatic if predicates are defined as modes of existence.
However, if x does not exist but has one predicate, namely ~E, then x
exists and does not exist.
-- CodeCutter - good, fast and cheap; pick two.
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Previous message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Atheists dying"
- Maybe in reply to: Immortalist: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Next in thread: Witt: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Witt: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: G. Frege: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: G. Frege: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|