Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension

From: Acid Pooh (poopdeville_at_gmail.com)
Date: 09/04/04 

Date: 4 Sep 2004 13:58:32 -0700

"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:
>
>
> This was the key missing piece in every refutation. They never
> bothered to say that it would be used as input to my unmodified
> Halt Analyzer. If they would have said this then the whole issue
> of not meeting the burden of proof of proving a negative would
> have never arisen.

No. We didn't. I mentioned this several times, once it became clear
that you didn't understand how Turing machines operate. (Also, note
that when doing "functional composition" in C++, the "inner function"
is providing input to the "outer function." This is trivial and a
mediocre C++ programmer should have realized this.) You just never
bothered to listen.

'cid 'ooh

Relevant Pages