Re: Existence as predicate
From: Paul Holbach (paulholbachSPAMBAN_at_freenet.de)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: A question on GIT."
- Previous message: you're going straight to hell: "Re: THE HALTING GODDAMN PROBLEM"
- In reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Sep 2004 13:10:10 -0700
> Kenneth Doyle <nobody@notmail.com> wrote in message news:<
> Xns955D74573C4C6nobodynotmailcom@61.9.191.5>...
> And for all we know, there might be a future king of France 100 years from
> now (at which time "the present king of France" will have a referrent).
>
> Is there some standard way of dealing with these sorts of situations, or do
> we just have to mind our "p"s and "q"s? For example, in the above
> paragraph, I almost wrote "there might be a present king of France 100
> years from now". To tie this back into the subject, I'm thinking that if
> existence is a predicate after all then perhaps it could serve as a
> temporal modifier. So we would have "exists now", "shall exist", "did
> exist" and even "might exist". Or something like that.
In order for you to be able to express the statement
"There might be a present king of France 100 years from now"
properly, you need to combine predicate logic, temporal logic, and
modal logic in a certain way.
Itīs really not easy to find an appropiate translation for an ordinary
language sentence like the one above, which seems pretty 'harmless'.
Letīs try it with a predicate-logic approach:
["n" : "now" / "ixKFx" : "the (present) king of France"]
<>Et[t = n+100y & Ex(x = ixKFx)(t)]
"It is possible that there is (will be) a time t such that t is 100
years away from now, and that, at t, there is somebody who is the
(present) king of France."
#PH
P.S.:
In the modal-logic approach to temporal logic, which has been
championed by Arthur Prior, tensed statements are usually expressed as
follows:
- "p" :<-> "It is now the case that p"
- "Fp" :<-> "It will/shall at some time be the case that p"
- "Pp" :<-> "It has at some time been the case that p"
For more information, see:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-temporal
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: A question on GIT."
- Previous message: you're going straight to hell: "Re: THE HALTING GODDAMN PROBLEM"
- In reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Reply: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence as predicate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|