Re: Disjunction in propositional logic

From: Karl Weber (dudendude_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/10/04


Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 01:48:25 +0200

Converter wrote:
 
> Both A and B are valid elementary propositions and the statement P is
> a valid disjunctive proposition, A is valid because it asserts that
> Easter will fall in March and B is valid because it asserts that
> Easter will fall in April.

Hmmm... isn't it a problem that A/B do not in any way specify _which_ Easter
will fall in March/April? Of course it should be ok if it is taken to mean
"This year, Easter ..."

> I think where the confusion comes in is that you have already come to
> the conclusion that easter will always fall within these two months
> and you haven't added it into your logic (your statement about not
> making sense wasn't symbolized within the propositional logic). So,
> the statement will always be true according to you.

I think, my problem was that the original P could be interpreted in two
different ways:

  P1 = "Every year, Easter will fall in March or in April"
  P2 = "This year, Easter falls in March or in April"

As I see it, P1 would be a statement of predicate logic, while P2 is a
statement of propositional logic... ?



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Disjunction in propositional logic
    ... >> Both A and B are valid elementary propositions and the statement P is ... A is valid because it asserts that ... >> Easter will fall in April. ... Well, sort of. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Disjunction in propositional logic
    ... >> Easter will fall in April. ... That doesn't mean the propositions aren't valid in propositional ... Here is an example of two valid elementary propositions and a valid ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Newbie logic questions
    ... This is the essence of implication, ... The truth or falsehood of the premises has no bearing on the truth ... between propositions, or a relation that holds between formulae. ... A asserts all of what proposition B asserts, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Axiom of Infinity
    ... This asserts, for each n, the existence of the successor. ... So, it represents a seq. ... of propositions Pi.Now, for any seq. ... have a precise methodology, by which the limit is arrived at. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?
    ... the necessary and sufficient condition for a relation of valid ... implication to hold between propositions P and Q? ... I say it is that Q asserts some or all of what is asserted by P, ...
    (sci.logic)