Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping and why FLT is also imprecise and thus false Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!

From: David Bandel (dwb1729_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/13/04 

Date: 12 Sep 2004 20:17:10 -0700

Archimedes Plutonium <a_plutonium@iw.net> wrote in message news:<4144C2E1.F8E63E27@iw.net>...
> 12 Sep 2004 08:18:04 -0700 someone from Harvard wrote:
> (some deletion)
>
> >
> >
> > Is it really that hard for you to conceive of a map with no borderlines drawn?
> >
> > Look halfway down this page:
>
> As the world slowly dawns onto the idea that Color Mapping was 2 Color and not 4
> Color Mapping as presumed from Guthrie to Cayley to Sylvester to other

[snipped useless garbage.. but not all of it (see above)]

the borderlines are just there to aid in distinguishing betwen two
neighoring regions.. obviously they aren't considered regions
themselves... it's sad that you can't realize that without someone
pointing it out for you.. i suggest you go back to your old forums....
you're not good at sci.math pranking