Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping and why FLT is also imprecise and thus false Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!

From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 09/15/04 

Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:03:55 -0500

Bill Jones wrote:

> I was thinking of an all white chess board with the squares outlined in black.
>

Well this gets back to the basics again and the difference between mathematics as the science of
precision and art or senses or feelings.

There is a Theory in Information that would say that 2 colors suffice to communicate any message
such as a white piece of paper and black ink pen. So you can draw pictures on the paper where one is
a chessboard with squares outlined in black or filled in alternating black. Or you can write
language on the paper.

But the fact remains that 2 colors suffice to convey all information. That means the Color-Mapping
Problem of 150 years old goes through a stage of where the ** maps are outlined with black ink on a
white *** of paper** the same as your chessboard.

And the option of filling in the squares with all black is the option of artists and mapp makers to
color in the country interiors with 3 other colors besides the white.

So you see the evidence-- that 4 Color Mapping of Guthrie, Cayley, Appel and Haken are not
mathematics but artwork. 2 Colors suffice to convey any and every message.

If you want more than 2 colors you are doing art and not mathematics. You are appealing to your
senses and not to the precision that is called for by mathematics.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Quantcast