sci.logic classic comments

From: |-|erc (spam_at_fodder.abc)
Date: 10/01/04 

Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 06:34:51 GMT

"Barb Knox" <see@sig.below> wrote in
> > you've just wrongly assumed your own benefit of the doubt.
>
> Also incorrect.

http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=g:thl1579806698d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=ca0s3i%245u0%241%40lust.ihug.co.nz

Herc 

--
DISCLAIMER By responding to this post you acknowledge a satelite mounted microwave laser will scan your
thoughts via residual neural sitmulous to your voice box audio and that any pro Truman thoughts will be modified
with ultrasonic phonetically compressed introduced thought.  Welcome to the TRUE-MAN show!

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stop being a bunch of pussies and use the killfile feature
    ... dangerous and incorrect information uncontradicted ... That could well be a fair reason for responding. ... There is a problem with both judith and nuxx. ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Email disclaimers
    ... > pertinence of adding a disclaimer at the end of our Email messages. ... > worth the while of adding it? ... representative screws up while doing something such are responding to an ... If it is a critical issue, then the small cost of proper Legal Advice ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... >> incorrect. ... >There is no point is responding to you because you only give unfounded ... Joe Fischer ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: ping GhostInTheMachine
    ... My screen just did something funny, so I'm reposting. ... So even though geometrically it appears you're responding to ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... > incorrect. ... There is no point is responding to you because you only give unfounded ... Dave ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)