Re: syllogism
From: Wolf Kirchmeir (wwolfkir_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: Dan Christensen: "Re: Comparing DC Proof with Metamath proof software"
- Previous message: David Longley: "Re: syllogism"
- In reply to: patty: "Re: syllogism"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: syllogism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:04:36 -0400
patty wrote:
[...]
> <http://icyberspace.net/patty/diagrams/logic-laws.jpg>
>
> patty
The diagram is a version of the standard definition of logical
equality/identity. Looks good.
BTW, if Fa symbolises "some statement about a" as in "skinny woman, big
man", then Fa, Fb assert something about a,b and the class F. So Fa ==
Fb asserts that a, b are both members of F, not that they are identical.
Insofar as they are both members of F, it doesn't matter which is
referred to when asserting statements about F, and in that sense the two
statements are logically equivalent. But some statements about a will be
true about b also, and some won't; and vice versa.
One has to be quite persnickety sometimes.
- Next message: Dan Christensen: "Re: Comparing DC Proof with Metamath proof software"
- Previous message: David Longley: "Re: syllogism"
- In reply to: patty: "Re: syllogism"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: syllogism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|