Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof
From: G. Frege (no_spam_at_aol.com)
Date: 10/20/04
- Next message: Mike Oliver: "Re: Aleph One Sets"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- In reply to: google-noreply.a.jp_at_xoxy.net: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Next in thread: Charlie-Boo: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Reply: Charlie-Boo: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:11:34 +0200
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:17:40 GMT, Josh Purinton
(google-noreply.a.jp@xoxy.net) wrote:
> In article <3df1e59f.0410200513.a33a073@posting.google.com>,
> Charlie-Boo <chvol@aol.com> wrote <bla bla>
>
> Back in January I pointed you to the Metamath book.
> Have you read it?
>
This is a joke, isn't it? (Charly just likes to babble...)
F.
- Next message: Mike Oliver: "Re: Aleph One Sets"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- In reply to: google-noreply.a.jp_at_xoxy.net: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Next in thread: Charlie-Boo: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Reply: Charlie-Boo: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]