Re: The Road with no Branches argument

From: block (block_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 10/24/04 

Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:30:39 GMT

"block" <block@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:...
>
> "Milan" <mtklima@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:2u0cv4F224h7dU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> > The pasted material lacks the mastery of the language, the narrative
> > tension, the grace and the eloquence of the stuff that emerges directly
> from
> > his inspired and magnificent pen.
> >
>
> Oh piss off and wash your mouth out with soap and water.
> And his pen is not magnificent, it's a computer keyboard.
> MATE!
>
>

Sorry Milan, that was cruel and unkind.................. it's just that I
can't see what the problem is. If Immortalist can find some material that
gives credence to an argument then what is the problem? You don't have to
read it. OK maybe it is not always 100% on the mark, but Jesus, he is only
human. I have personally benefited from some of the info he has pasted in
response to a question, agreed not always, but then even in plain original
English some of us are way off the mark.
I can't understand why everyone seems to have got onto this "let's knock
Immortalist" bandwagon.