Re: Preaching To The Converted
From: Albert (alwagner_at_tcac.net)
Date: 10/25/04
- Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- In reply to: Kamerynn: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:56:42 -0500
Kamerynn wrote:
<snip>
> A good post, Immortalist. Depressing, but good. I say
> that it's depressing because I view the majority as uninformed.
> This is why the majority can, for example, be persuaded by
> presidential "debates." It's sad to think that a one-sided
> argument could convince anyone.
> Anyway - thanks for the post.
Don't encourage him. Follow the links and thank the real author.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- In reply to: Kamerynn: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Preaching To The Converted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|