Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism
From: 1Z (peterdjones_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Mani Deli: "and who made god?"
- Previous message: Rosebud: "Re: Gettier Problems"
- In reply to: Immortalist: "Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Oct 2004 08:41:26 -0700
"Immortalist" <Reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> The link you gave concluded with this paragraph;
>
> "The compatibilists version of Alternative Possibilities is is really
> alternative histories. It says the history of the universe could have been
> different up to time T. However, I have no power to change history, so the
> Compatibilist version of Free will does not add up to any positive power of
> volition."
>
> The "I" he talks about is subjective experience, which is probably the activities
> of nerve cells and this "I" does have power to change history by participating in
> decisions that lead to actions.
It doesn't have the power to change *past* history.
> Also the argument prostrates itself to the skeptic all to easily because the
> author can't claim to "know" that a person can or can't change history at time T
> with complete justification for that belief may be mistaken and it hasn't been
> shown how to remove all chance of error.
That is completely back to front. You don't 'prostrate' yourself by
saying
things which are less than 100% certain, you prostrate yourself by
agrreing
with the sceptic that you cannot say or believe something unless you
are 100% certain.
- Next message: Mani Deli: "and who made god?"
- Previous message: Rosebud: "Re: Gettier Problems"
- In reply to: Immortalist: "Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Endurantists vs Perdurantism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|