Re: Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter
From: Alex Vinokur (alexvn_at_big-foot.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- In reply to: André Betz: "Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter"
- Next in thread: André Betz: "Re: Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter"
- Reply: André Betz: "Re: Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:25:28 +0200
"André Betz" <mail@andrebetz.de> wrote in message news:cllv6i$mu2$02$1@news.t-online.com...
> Hi,
>
> I've written a converter which transforms a turing machine description
> into a line section (see also Chalcraft Train Sets). So if someone is
> interested feel free to download it here
> http://sky4walk.gmxhome.de/TM2Train.zip.
>
> André Betz
> http://www.andrebetz.de
Could you give some information about Chalcraft Train Sets according to article
D.A. Chalcraft and M.T. Greene. Train sets. Eureka, 53:5--12, 1994 ?
Could you also give some example how your program works?
What is input (with simple sample)?
What is output?
What is computational process?
Thanks,
--
Alex Vinokur
email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com
http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- In reply to: André Betz: "Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter"
- Next in thread: André Betz: "Re: Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter"
- Reply: André Betz: "Re: Turing Machine to Train Sets Converter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|