Re: and who made god?
From: King John II the Good (redafroeclipse_at_aol.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: 1Z: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Oct 2004 19:43:33 -0700
> The theist argument that god is the first cause is demolished by the
> question, and who made god.
There was a 5th century monk named Thomas Aquinas. He came up with
a series of points proving why time cannot be infinite, there must be
an innicial event to cause all predescesing events. Unfortunatly I
cannot recall these points at the moment, however I do remember that
over the past 1500 years 4 out of 5 of his points were proven wrong.
Regardless, the question who created God, is completely irrelevent
to the belief of God. If God didn't exist, than the question of what
created the Universe still persists. The explenation for beggining of
the Universe under the theory of the Big Bang is just as shaky as the
explenation that religion gives. No matter what you can say: and what
started the big bang, or what caused God to appear.
Asking who made God is a completely futile question. Its like
trying to teach a dog self-awareness, human beings just cant
comprehend such an immense concept as something coming from nothing.
Its ultimatley a question on where your faith is, agnosticism,
science, or religion.
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: 1Z: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|