Re: and who made god?
From: Ron Peterson (ron_at_shell.core.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Anthony Cerrato: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Previous message: Robert Low: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- In reply to: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: Zim: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Zim: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Oct 2004 06:36:48 -0700
X's Lover <together@hell.com> wrote in message news:<together-EA6D38.23022327102004@news.isp.giganews.com>...
> In article <f301b05.0410271843.3d86910c@posting.google.com>,
> redafroeclipse@aol.com (King John II the Good) wrote:
>
> > > The theist argument that god is the first cause is demolished by the
> > > question, and who made god.
> The formulation of this question is very odd. Why would anyone
> hypothesize that a "who" created a god rather than a "what"?
Someone had to invent god. Humans aren't in contact with any other
creature that would be capable of inventing god.
Isn't it reasonable that some story teller invented god to make for
interesting stories?
-- Ron
- Next message: Anthony Cerrato: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Previous message: Robert Low: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- In reply to: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: Zim: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Zim: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: X's Lover: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]