Re: and who made god?
From: Mani Deli (mani_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Norman Megill: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- In reply to: King John II the Good: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:05:39 -0400
On 27 Oct 2004 19:43:33 -0700, redafroeclipse@aol.com (King John II
the Good) wrote:
>> The theist argument that god is the first cause is demolished by the
>> question, and who made god.
> Regardless, the question who created God, is completely irrelevent
>to the belief of God.
Yes, unless you claim he's the first cause or you don't want to hear
about it, which is usually the case.
>-If God didn't exist, than the question of what
>created the Universe still persists.
As does the question who made god.
>The explenation for beggining of
>the Universe under the theory of the Big Bang is just as shaky as the
>explenation that religion gives.
No, it admits to that it could be wrong, its based on evidence and
doesn't claim to be a first cause.
> Asking who made God is a completely futile question.
Because it stumps believers.
God is the stupid answer to any question.
No skill no art!
Tired of Modern Art? check http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/
"The true axis of evil in America is the brilliance of our marketing
combined with the stupidity of our people."
- Bill Maher
- Next message: Norman Megill: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: (Not quite) Cantor's diagonal proof"
- In reply to: King John II the Good: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|