Re: and who made god?
From: Zim (Nosy?_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- Previous message: Zim: "Re: and who made god?"
- In reply to: King John II the Good: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:22:22 GMT
"King John II the Good" <redafroeclipse@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f301b05.0410281257.1fa6fd61@posting.google.com...
>
> The Teological argument describes how the complection of the world
> is so great that there must be some ultimate creator. When one looks
> at nature, human beings, animals, and such things, they see the world
> as such a fantastically beautiful and complicated thing that it is
> impossible that it occured by chance. Arguing for, or against the
> existance of God is stupid and futile for it is circulatory. However,
> when looking at the almost infinite deapth of the Universe, its
> virtually unbreakable rules of Nature that seem to animate the
> inanimate, and the underlying pattern of it all, I get a true honest
> feeling that some sort of concious being must of created it.
An interesting book I ran into which discusses the universe and physics, as
contemporary science understands it along with concepts of god is:
"The Hidden Face of God" by Gerald L. Schroeder
- Next message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- Previous message: Zim: "Re: and who made god?"
- In reply to: King John II the Good: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
