Infinity is not that big!
From: HERC777 (herc777_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: HERC777: "Cantor's complete list assumption is not extrapolated"
- Previous message: Acid Pooh: "Re: Possible Proof of the Lusin-Purves Theorem"
- Next in thread: Karl-Olav Nyberg: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Karl-Olav Nyberg: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Normus Chirac: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Abraham Buckingham: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: A threat from Bin Laden is all that is required to provide a landslide victory : "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Oct 2004 16:15:29 -0700
oo is not a number
oo has no magnitude
0 is not a natural number
0 has no magnitude
if infinity was a number then oo = 0
Herc
- Next message: HERC777: "Cantor's complete list assumption is not extrapolated"
- Previous message: Acid Pooh: "Re: Possible Proof of the Lusin-Purves Theorem"
- Next in thread: Karl-Olav Nyberg: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Karl-Olav Nyberg: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Normus Chirac: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Abraham Buckingham: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: A threat from Bin Laden is all that is required to provide a landslide victory : "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
