Re: Infinity is not that big!
From: Normus Chirac (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Previous message: Karl-Olav Nyberg: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- In reply to: HERC777: "Infinity is not that big!"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:13:42 -0500
"HERC777" <herc777@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d8422d00.0410281515.4c290ad2@posting.google.com...
> oo is not a number
> oo has no magnitude
oo is a number greater than all the other positive numbers
oo's magnitude is greater than all other numbers
>
> 0 is not a natural number
> 0 has no magnitude
0 is a natural number, it was born way.
0 is a magnitude, and has a magnitude of 0
>
> if infinity was a number then oo = 0
But you state that infinity is not a number, so how can it = 0.
>
> Herc
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Previous message: Karl-Olav Nyberg: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- In reply to: HERC777: "Infinity is not that big!"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|