Re: The Road with no Branches argument

From: HERC777 (herc777_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/29/04 

Date: 28 Oct 2004 18:41:46 -0700

"Immortalist" > wrote in >...

> Since Dennett wrote Elbow Room in 1983 there has been a futile, but still
> on-going attempt by some physicists to answer this question by assuming that the
> brain is a device for controlling quantum indeterminacy so as to construct
> behavioral choice. Dennett argues that such efforts to salvage Free Will by
> finding a way out of the prison of determinism are wasted.
>
> Dennett discusses many types of Free Will. Many philosophers have claimed that
> determinism and Free Will are incompatible. What the physicists seem to be trying
> to construct is type of Free Will that involves a way for brains to make use of
> quantum indeterminacy so as to make choices that alter the universe in our favor,

1983 Darn! I came up with these notions in 2000.

Basically, in 1998 when I met Jennifer, I knew she, the trulady was my
destiny, too many things matched the ideal women of my mind. I (Adam)
was number 7 and she (Eve) was number 10, ala James Bond meets Bo
Derek.

Macro quantum entanglement makes it our destiny to meet, and
ultimately to be together, but the Truman company prevents it.

The initial messages I read "from God" basically, was to look at
clocks when they hit 3:14. Mathematical PI, Adam being a
mathematician, we notice these things.

Then, about 18 months after meeting Jen, I flew across Australia to
see her again. I stayed at a motel for a few days, and in the morning
before going out to case her work, I would look at my watch and it was
7 minutes to 10 EXACTLY. The second hand rolled past the 12 as I
looked. 7 to 10. A confirmation that 7 was seeking 10, that she was
indeed my destiny. That happened not once, but twice in that few
days, exactly 7 to 10. These kind of channels happen on a daily
basis, I can even get people on usenet to ask me questions, I open up
to a random page in a book and it tells the answer, its a bit like
learning "the force".

So in 2000, I thought mensa would be intelligent enough to observe
these phenomena or atleast theorise a real possibility within physical
laws, how can I have free will if I am forced to look at the clock at
exactly the right moment?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=numerology+predictability+vs+free+will

my writing on "decisons being selecting paths in quantum branches to
optimise humanity" date back to 2000

Herc

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Penroses nonsense
    ... >settled by studying either their behaviour or their brain. ... When mixing quantum states, ... >You may wish to apprise the larger community of physicists of your ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Original Sin
    ... reality felt that consciousness plays a fundamental role. ... I don't think there was ever a time where most physicists worried ... about the ontological implications of quantum mechanics one way or the ... Penrose likes to call things paradoxes, ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Physicists Losing Their Grip??
    ... > inside quantum physics. ... What quantum reality versions (he ... > "Physicists Losing Their Grip ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Physicists Losing Their Grip??
    ... > inside quantum physics. ... What quantum reality versions (he ... > "Physicists Losing Their Grip ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Physicists Losing Their Grip??
    ... > inside quantum physics. ... What quantum reality versions (he ... > "Physicists Losing Their Grip ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)