Re: Logic & Science Cover Everything But Grunts & Groans About Value Judgments
From: X's Lover (together_at_hell.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: 1Z: "Re: and who made god?"
- Previous message: Abraham Buckingham: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Maybe in reply to: Immortalist: "Logic & Science Cover Everything But Grunts & Groans About Value Judgments"
- Next in thread: Alfred Einstead: "Re: Logic & Science Cover Everything But Grunts & Groans About Value Judgments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:08:41 -0400
In article <1099023344.782916.49210@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
demecus@myway.com wrote:
> True enough... but as this is a Philosophy forum I figured I would
> mention it in the context of that story. True enough though.
It wasn't a criticism per se. It was an observation thought that
sometimes knowing the existence of a thing is also connected to knowing
how it came to be.
Consider defining "what is an apple?" An apple is only an apple during a
specific time -- there seems to be a before and after. The seed and
blossom, or the rotting unappetizing fruit. The definition of apple is
specific to time and sometimes space.
> X's Lover wrote:
> > In article <1098935233.706240.144060@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> > demecus@myway.com wrote:
> >
> > > Whether or
> > > not human eyes ever see/discover said storm is irrelevant.
> >
> > I find there is a huge amount of energy expended on arguing what
> exists
> > versus what doesn't. The question that I find more interesting is how
>
> > things things come into existence regardless of how the
> > existence/reality is measured.
- Next message: 1Z: "Re: and who made god?"
- Previous message: Abraham Buckingham: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Maybe in reply to: Immortalist: "Logic & Science Cover Everything But Grunts & Groans About Value Judgments"
- Next in thread: Alfred Einstead: "Re: Logic & Science Cover Everything But Grunts & Groans About Value Judgments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|