Re: and who made god?

From: Mani Deli (mani_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 10/29/04 

Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:32:24 -0400

On 28 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0700, redafroeclipse@aol.com (King John II
the Good) wrote:

>One can say that as the world progresses man's understanding of God
>deepens;

One can say it until one is blue in the face. The fact is that no one
knows anything about any gods because there is no evidence.

>. One can say: all that God is, is the cause of the Big
>Bang, the one who's creativity, knowledge, and power is great enough
>to calculate exactly what is neccesary to create the world as we know
>it.

But no one can show any evidence for it.

>. However saying that there is no meta-physical being
>that planned man's creation, seems almost impossible when looking
>closly at the world.

To anyone who got his education in Sunday school.

> The Teological argument describes how the complection of the world
>is so great that there must be some ultimate creator.

Theology is pure bull***. One can't study gods.

>When one looks
>at nature, human beings, animals, and such things, they see the world
>as such a fantastically beautiful and complicated thing that it is
>impossible that it occured by chance.

If all you learned is Sunday school science.

>Arguing for, or against the
>existance of God is stupid and futile for it is circulatory. However,
>when looking at the almost infinite deapth of the Universe, its
>virtually unbreakable rules of Nature that seem to animate the
>inanimate, and the underlying pattern of it all, I get a true honest
>feeling that some sort of concious being must of created it.

Yes, god is the mature man's Santa Claus.

No skill no art!

Tired of Modern Art? check http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/

"The true axis of evil in America is the brilliance of our marketing
combined with the stupidity of our people."
- Bill Maher