Re: The Road with no Branches argument
From: HERC777 (herc777_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Previous message: Josh Purinton: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- In reply to: HERC777: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Next in thread: X's Lover: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Oct 2004 04:14:52 -0700
herc777@hotmail.com (HERC777) wrote in message
> closed system and detect if any information has been introduced from
> the future. This is usually detecting a surplus of coincidences that
> endless. Whatever I write about on usenet each day will be a key
> feature on television that night, as if it was laid out for me to
> write amd do those things.
Check www.yourtv.com.au, would you believe the movie on tonight just
hours after
writing that was BACK TO THE FUTURE 2.
You can tell my post just followed the threads topic, and the movie
was set for its timeslot long before I posted about "information from
the future".
Yet these 2 seperate events coincide, just as I said something would,
macro quantum entanglement if I can do that every day.
<<detecting a surplus of coincidences>>
Herc
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Infinity is not that big!"
- Previous message: Josh Purinton: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- In reply to: HERC777: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Next in thread: X's Lover: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
