Re: The Road with no Branches argument
From: 1Z (peterdjones_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: the separation of logic from the application of science"
- Previous message: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Maybe in reply to: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Next in thread: Milan: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Reply: Milan: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Nov 2004 06:59:03 -0800
"Milan" <mtklima@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<2uicrfF2bh69dU1@uni-
> Classical mechanics is completely deterministic.
But the universe isn't, which is one of the reasons why classical mechanics
was superseded. It survives only as a useful approximation, so you can't
argue to determinism -- even effective determinism at certain levels -- from it.
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: the separation of logic from the application of science"
- Previous message: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Maybe in reply to: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Next in thread: Milan: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Reply: Milan: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]