Re: The Road with no Branches argument
From: Milan (mtklima_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/02/04
- Next message: Milan: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Previous message: HERC777: "Re: FBI SADISTS SEXUALLY ABUSED and RAPED ME for 3 YRS and BEHEADED ME"
- In reply to: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Next in thread: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Reply: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 00:19:10 -0000
"1Z" <peterdjones@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fd762132.0411010659.47b5ccc2@posting.google.com...
> "Milan" <mtklima@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<2uicrfF2bh69dU1@uni-
>
> > Classical mechanics is completely deterministic.
>
> But the universe isn't, which is one of the reasons why classical
mechanics
> was superseded. It survives only as a useful approximation, so you can't
> argue to determinism -- even effective determinism at certain levels --
from it.
But that wasnt the point, was it?
regards
Milan
- Next message: Milan: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Previous message: HERC777: "Re: FBI SADISTS SEXUALLY ABUSED and RAPED ME for 3 YRS and BEHEADED ME"
- In reply to: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Next in thread: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Reply: 1Z: "Re: The Road with no Branches argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]