Re: Why "geometric"?
From: Tim Mellor (timm_at_amsta.leeds.ac.uk)
Date: 11/02/04
- Next message: George Greene: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- In reply to: George Cox: "Why "geometric"?"
- Next in thread: George Cox: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- Reply: George Cox: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Nov 2004 15:17:23 -0800
George Cox <george_coxanti@spambtinternet.com.invalid> wrote in message news:<4185690D.E1476ACB@spambtinternet.com.invalid>...
> A first order formula is called "geometric" if it is built up from
> atomic formulae using only conjunction, disjunction and existential
> quantification. But why "geometric"?
>
> Tia
> GC
I am afraid I haven't heard this usage. What is the context?
- Next message: George Greene: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory"
- In reply to: George Cox: "Why "geometric"?"
- Next in thread: George Cox: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- Reply: George Cox: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|