Re: Why "geometric"?
From: George Cox (george_coxanti_at_spambtinternet.com.invalid)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: whit0911_at_umn.edu: "Re: New countable infiniity logic"
- Previous message: George Cox: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- In reply to: Tim Mellor: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:17:02 +0000 (UTC)
Tim Mellor wrote:
>
> George Cox <george_coxanti@spambtinternet.com.invalid> wrote in message news:<4185690D.E1476ACB@spambtinternet.com.invalid>...
> > A first order formula is called "geometric" if it is built up from
> > atomic formulae using only conjunction, disjunction and existential
> > quantification. But why "geometric"?
> >
> > Tia
> > GC
>
> I am afraid I haven't heard this usage. What is the context?
See Keith Ramsay's contribution! I can't remember where I first came
across it--in some FOL text I suppose.
- Next message: whit0911_at_umn.edu: "Re: New countable infiniity logic"
- Previous message: George Cox: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- In reply to: Tim Mellor: "Re: Why "geometric"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|