Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?

From: Curt Welch (curt_at_kcwc.com)
Date: 11/15/04 

Date: 15 Nov 2004 06:07:11 GMT

poopdeville@gmail.com (Acid Pooh) wrote:
> curt@kcwc.com (Curt Welch) wrote in message
> news:<20041114160910.221$fP@newsreader.com>...
> > fishfry <BLOCKSPAMfishfry@your-mailbox.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If all you're interested in is the physical world, then you don't
> > > need infinite sets, let alone the real numbers.
> >
> > My interest is not in the physical world alone, it's in the
> > relationship between the physical and mental worlds. To solve AI, we
> > have to completely understand that relationship.
>
> If those are necessary conditions for solving AI, you're screwed.

:)

That's exactly why AI is not an easy problem. It is the solution to how
the two worlds connect. If you can not explain the connection, you can not
solve AI. It's unproven if AI is a problem that we (humans) have the power
to solve. I do happen to belive we have the power to solve it, (or else it
would be kinda stupid for me to spend time on it), but I also know it is
just a leap of faith on my part to believe that. 

-- 
Curt Welch                                            http://CurtWelch.Com/
curt@kcwc.com                                        http://NewsReader.Com/