Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Goedel applied to the real-world"
- In reply to: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:13:57 -0500
Curt Welch wrote:
>
> I use it in the general sense of being able to build a machine with all the
> powers of cognition and behavior that humans have. I like to call that
> "strong AI" but that term actually means something different already in the
> AI argument.
I will tell you how to make an intelligent machine and have lots of fun
doing it, too. Find a fertile female person, have sexual congress with
her, and make babies. There are your intelligent machines. You don't
have to be an engineer or a mathematician to do it, either.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Previous message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Goedel applied to the real-world"
- In reply to: Curt Welch: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]