Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?

From: Curt Welch (curt_at_kcwc.com)
Date: 11/16/04 

Date: 16 Nov 2004 00:36:34 GMT

poopdeville@gmail.com (Acid Pooh) wrote:
> Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you expect to be able to verify
> that a machine is cognating, you're not going to be able to in any
> non-functionalist sense. And that's not going to satisfy many people.

It will satisfy them in the end. I'll let you figure out why that must
be true. 

-- 
Curt Welch                                            http://CurtWelch.Com/
curt@kcwc.com                                        http://NewsReader.Com/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantors diagonal proof wrong?
    ... > Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you expect to be able to verify ... > that a machine is cognating, you're not going to be able to in any ... And that's not going to satisfy many people. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: ECC Result Verification
    ... flip wrote: ... > can someone please verify these results? ... > The set of points that satisfy E are given by: ... "dblmod" functions you can use. ...
    (sci.math)
  • question about ocx control
    ... I think I am correct on this but need to verify just to satisfy my ... I can only access ocx controls in a windows environment or an ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ole)
  • Re: ECC Result Verification
    ... flip wrote: ... > can someone please verify these results? ... > The set of points that satisfy E are given by: ... "dblmod" functions you can use. ...
    (sci.crypt)